Last night, as I listened to Rafael “Ted” Cruz double down on his idea to “patrol Muslim neighborhoods,” I was, again, disappointed in the divisive rhetoric used to combat the war on terror. This is not about political correctness. This is not about “telling it like it is.” This is blatant bigotry, playing on our fears by creating an “other,” and cloaking words in easy-to-digest euphemisms. To support such a policy is to be an enemy of the Constitution.
Consider this, since September 11, 2001, the vast majority of domestic acts of terrorism in the United States have been perpetrated by White, Christian men. Imagine a world where a presidential candidate suggests that we “patrol Christian neighborhoods.” What discussions would result then?
It’s easy to identify Muslim Americans as the “other,” the ones that don’t “look” like the rest of us. You can identify Muslims by how they dress, eat, pray, and oftentimes by the color of their skin. Our country has a history of dividing people, conquering citizen’s hearts & minds by labeling a group of people as “others.” The Africans, Italians, Irish, Japanese, Homosexuals, Jews, Mormons, and now the Muslims can attest to this. It’s easy to fall into the trap of labeling anyone identifying with those groups as the “other.”
We must always be alert when our leaders talk about “others” along racial, religious, & ethnic lines, and we have to resist the temptation to turn Muslim Americans into the “other.” We must understand that by singling out a group for disparate treatment, we create the space, opportunity, and motive for that group to radicalize; in this instance, we become what the enemy has proselytized all along. The thing we seek to prevent will be created by our own failure to recognize that there are far more hard-working, patriotic Muslim Americans, than there are radicalized ones. In order to fight domestic terrorism we cannot alienate our Muslim communities.
Your civility and thoughts — in agreement or disagreement — are appreciated, your ignorance, is not.
It’s becoming increasingly hard to resist the temptation to be an angry black man. All my life I’ve tried to straddle the line between objective fairness and Black homerism. This past week pushed my sensibilities to the limit. Tuesday was one of the most emotionally draining days of my life. What started Monday night, as an annoyance, ended Tuesday as full-blown disappointment. As people I respect, intelligent people, classmates, long-time friends, and other weighed in on the aftermath of the Darren Wilson grand jury announcement, many – dare I say too many? – were quick to point to the conclusion of the grand jury as evidence that no crime was committed. Proof, these folks said, that our justice system works!
But did the justice system work in this instance? There are a lot of questions about Attorney General Robert McCullouch, and whether he possessed the requisite credentials to properly try this case before the grand jury. I can’t escape the feeling that he should have recused himself – he having a well-documented, chummy relationship with local law enforcement, including serving as president of a local organization that fundraises for officers in Missouri and Illinois – from a situation that was bound to raise eyebrows no matter the outcome. What has become of prosecutorial ethics? During the press conference, McCulloch did everything he could to discredit witnesses who did not support the grand jury’s conclusion.
Yes we’ve made great strides in our attempts to become a post-racial America, however, it’s clear we still have a long road to hoe before we can celebrate equality before the law. The facts don’t lie: Black men (and other racial minority groups) are targeted by the criminal justice system. Black, Latino, and Asian Americans make up 26% of the general population, yet they represent 58% of the prison population. Black Americans are particularly susceptible to prison time. In Christopher Stone’s 1999 study Race, Crime, and the Administration of Justice: A summary of the Available Facts, Stone notes the prevalence of Black faces behind prison walls. Nationally, Black Americans accounted for fewer than half of the arrests for violent crimes, but they accounted for about 60% of prison admissions. A 2007 study conducted by Yale University College of Law concluded that Black defendants receive the death penalty at three times the rate of white defendants in cases where the victims are white. Furthermore, killers of white victims are treated more severely than people who kill minorities when it comes to deciding what charges to bring.
Given the history of racial antagonism in Ferguson and McCulloch’s cozy relationship with local police, one can’t help but question the process and the evidence presented to the grand jury. Furthermore, the relationship between Ferguson’s largely Black community and its nearly all-white police force, is strained to say the least. According to Newsweek:
A recent report by the legal defense nonprofit ArchCity Defenders found that 86 percent of vehicle stops in Ferguson involved a black driver, although just 67 percent of the city’s 21,203 residents are black. These traffic violations, which sometimes lead to weeks in jail, are an enormous burden on the black community. In 2013, the Ferguson Municipal Court disposed of 24,532 arrest warrants and 12,018 cases—“about 3 warrants and 1.5 cases per household,” the report said. Fines and court fees are Ferguson’s second largest revenue source.
“We’re just used to raise revenue,” said Patricia Bynes, a Democratic committeewoman for Ferguson Township. “On traffic day in these little municipalities, you usually find a white judge in the courtroom, white prosecutor, and you find lines of black people lined up around the corner that have been charged with these tickets.”
This constant low-level harassment of the black community has become the main point of contact between most black residents and the criminal justice system. And it always comes with the threat of violence. As multiple news reports since the Brown shooting have revealed, police in North County too often use excessive force against the black community.
Though the facts remain unclear, it appears Brown’s deadly confrontation with Officer Wilson began as a jaywalking stop. McCulloch isn’t involved in traffic stops, but the people of North County see the Brown shooting and the excessive traffic tickets as part of the same oppressive system. “To me, this is all police brutality, this is all excessive force, this is all racial profiling,” said Bynes.
When I speak of White Privilege, I talk about the unspoken advantages and lens through which many of my white brothers and sisters view the world. Often it’s due to ignorance and lack of exposure, other times it’s willful ignorance of the facts. White Privilege is real, and Michael Brown’s death allows us to reexamine how it shapes inter-racial interactions and how it challenges some of our deeply held beliefs about our country and justice system. Ferguson can not be analyzed in a vacuum. It must be viewed through the lens of 400 years of history, oppression, persecution, and fear-mongering. It should be understood through the eyes of a Black American citizen living in Ferguson, under the auspices of police practices that are suspect at best, and at worst, a blatant example of racial profiling. If a Black person is upset at the loss of life and the perceived lack of justice, you should be empathetic to their plight, understanding that it’s the latest in a line of slights, and perceived injustices. Those people deserve to at least have their viewpoints respected. Understand the end of slavery didn’t suddenly usher in an era of economic and political justice, it was merely the beginning of a fight for equality that continues today, and our broken justice system is proof of that; what happened in Ferguson is proof of that. The murder of Michael Brown was not the start of racial tension in Ferguson, Missouri, it was merely the spark that triggered the ire of a community at loggerheads with its police force. Those folks who are looting, burning buildings, and using civil disobedience to protest what they see as an injustice have apparently come to a conclusion: marches and rallies only get you so far, the political & economic justice they seek must be taken.
Its been a couple of days since the announcement, and I am still angry, still teetering between hopelessness, numbness, and the small space that separates each. But I am naturally an optimist, nothing is ever as good or as bad as it seems. And that’s why I’ve chosen to be a lawyer, so I can impact people, and my community in positive ways, using mechanisms that bring people together, with justice as the overriding principle. I’ll leave you with the words of hope, and encouragement that Professor Myles Lynk left with me last Tuesday night:
[A]s law students now and as lawyers to be, you should engage with your communities as a public citizen to improve: the substantive law, access by all to the legal system, the administration of justice, and the quality of legal services. As a volunteer lawyer or an elected official or in a professional career as a criminal prosecutor or a criminal defense lawyer, you should work to help bridge the gap that often exists between minority communities and the majority-white police departments that police them. Does the community feel it is being served by the police, or being contained by them? There is so much that you as a lawyer will be able to do. We do not have the time or the luxury to be depressed or dispirited by what has happened. We are lawyers. “We Can Handle It!” What we need to do is help the communities and the individuals who cannot.
I love you all, and there’s nothing you can do about it.
The weekend of the Super Bowl & the Phoenix Open here in Arizona is the ultimate socialite’s dream. Sports, drinks, people, & the Who’s Who of Arizona can all be seen walking the greens at the TPC Scottsdale on Saturday afternoon. I have enjoyed the tradition for many years, & this year was no different. After the usual drinks with family & friends we headed out for a great afternoon of socializing, more drinks, & a little golf. However, this year, something happened to me that I hadn’t experienced before at TPC. Let’s talk a bit.
Some background is necessary; Speaking to a white gentleman at the Open, I made small talk, asking him how he got such a cushy job grilling at the most beautiful course in Arizona, on the best weekend of the year. As we talked, he mentioned something that caused me some consternation. Out of nowhere, he mentioned Obama. He said, with an air of sarcasm, that he didn’t need to work, & that Obama would provide jobs for everyone. Stunned, I said nothing. He went on to say that he doesn’t worry about anything because Obama would pay for everything, because, well he already does. I could only respond with, “is that right?” To which his response was, simply “Yep.” I took my hotdog & slunk away, unable to mount a response or truly grasp the underlying meaning of his words. To the man at the hot dog cart near the 16th hole at TPC Scottsdale, I have some questions: Why? Why do you feel the need to accost a stranger at a golf tournament about our Nation’s first Black (see: multiracial) President? Do you approach your white customers & complain about Bush or Reagan or Clinton policies? How does a conversation about grilling & hot dogs turn into one about your disdain for the President? Is it because of your deep-seated racial beliefs that you felt it was necessary to project said beliefs onto me? I just can’t shake the feeling that your frustration with Barack Hussein Obama is tied to his Blackness, & that manifested itself in the words you spoke yesterday to Joel Demitrius White III. (This is also further evidence of why many in our community think that much of the opposition to Obama is because of his race, over pleas that objections to him are in spite of it.) I hate using race as the basis for assuming disparate treatment, but in this situation, I am left with no other choice to assume the worst. In any event, I need to say today, what I failed to say yesterday: your behavior was boorish, inappropriate & wrong; your conduct displayed a level of bigotry & ignorance not readily apparent to many, but necessary to identify & discuss. I can’t imagine a scenario where I’d approach a white person & project my disdain for — insert any of the 43 white presidents we’ve had — onto them. I am not a stand-in for your criticism of the President because I am not him, we simply happen to share a similar racial makeup; it’s critically important you don’t confuse that point. Let’s be clear, I won’t use this space to silence you, ask you to not serve hot dogs at the Open next year, make personal attacks or condemn you as a person. I don’t want to engage in race-baiting & turn this into a case of Black Victimization, because I simply don’t believe those things are conducive to a healthy conversation about race. It’s your actions that gave rise to these words, & we should never confuse the actions of a person with that person’s otherwise moral character. I want to use this space to say to you if your words yesterday are indicative of your true feelings about a group of people you work with, go to church with, serve at a weekend golf tournament, & share a community with, then you are wrong, & you should reassess your thoughts, conscious & otherwise.
I can’t stress this enough: there can’t be true discussion about race if we simply condemn those people who share non-mainstream views to silence. That is not how a healthy discussion is coordinated, & we can’t continue those practices. We punt on racial issues in this country so much & so often, in the hopes that we can drown them out & relegate those beliefs to the sidelines. Let me be among the first to say that we have to go for it on 4th down, & that attempt can only be successful with a healthy, well-rounded, robust dialogue.
I hope you all reblog, repost, retweet, & share this enough times in the hopes that this man sees that what he did was inappropriate. While I dropped the ball on Saturday, I want to use this space to have that conversation. As always, I write from a place of love, unity, & understanding, with the goal of forming a more perfect community.
I love you all, & there’s nothing you can do about it.
Many of you have reached out to me to gauge my temperature on the recent “MLK Black Party” hosted by the Tau Kappa Epsilon (“TKE”) fraternity. My reaction is quite simple: I have none. I am not hurt, bothered, offended, belittled, nor disturbed by the photos, the caricatures, the overwhelming publicity, or the idea that some white kids in Tempe, Arizona think tennis shoes, grills, & jerseys represent the Black community. Why am I not offended? For the same reason Richard Sherman screaming into a microphone on national TV does not bother me: it doesn’t represent me. I won’t allow, in fact refuse, to allow it to represent me, my brand, or my family. Let’s talk a little bit.
I find it incredibly disappointing that we feel we must employ our local Black leaders to speak out on this issue. Jarrett Maupin, a man I’ve known since high school, felt the need to speak out on this issue to the local media, even going as far as to call for the expulsion of those who attended the party. Said, Mr. Maupin, “TKE has a problem with African-American students…They have a problem with black people as a race, and there’s no room for that in what [ASU President Michael] Crow has called ‘The New American University.'” Mr. Maupin further added that if he didn’t receive a meeting with Dr. Crow, he would call for a boycott of the Sun Devil athletic program & its efforts to generate donations to remodel the football stadium.
This is wrong for two reasons: first, by Mr. Maupin speaking out, there’s a sense of ownership on behalf of the Black community of the kind of “culture” on display at the TKE event, & second, the call for these young men & women to be expelled from school is not only violative of their speech rights, but counterproductive to the type of full-bodied, productive dialogue Dr. King would’ve encouraged. Was this party in poor-taste? Absolutely. However, punishing protected, but non-mainstream speech only serves to push the folks who share those views away from the discussion table. To Mr. Maupin, & those who support his agenda, I would politely remind them that those same speech & assembly protections they readily obstruct allowed Dr. King to promote his message of equality through peaceful protest. To stand on the shoulders of a giant such as Dr. King, & to use the tools he used for anything other than constructive dialogue is an insult to his cause, to our cause. To those supporters of Mr. Maupin & his ilk, I warn you to tread carefully.
The way to promote cultural sensitivity is through dialogue, not condemnation. More importantly, there must be an intra-Black community dialogue about the Black Americans who profit from this type of depiction of us as a people. It hard not to think of Black folks as watermelon-loving caricatures when that’s largely how we portray ourselves. We have got to start talking to one another about how we talk, act, & dress. We’ve got to raise the bar, our standards & our expectations. Entitlement, the lack of strong male leadership, & the deterioration of the two-parent home have left Black communities across this country in shambles. Calling for the expulsion of some kids having a frat-house party won’t fix that, & in fact only further serves the purpose reinforcing the victimhood mentality that is so pervasive in the Black community. Instead of being victims, let’s be proactive & attack these problems at the root & have discussions on socially acceptable behavior within our Black communities. We have to stop holding those outside of our Black community to higher standards than we expect of ourselves. These discussions must take place first at home, from parent to child, & that is something we have to address as a Black community.
I write to my community, the community of all races, in the sprit of love, unity, & greater understanding. We must all understand & accept the collectivist narrative that we are in this together. We will fail & succeed together. We must strive to achieve greater understanding together. However, before we can achieve any of these idealistic goals, we must first be accountable as individuals; there must be self-reflection & we have to ask ourselves are we apart of the problem or the solution? When leadership speaks out to silence those disagreeable viewpoints the conversation is prematurely blunted & the argument is circular, only to surface again in few weeks time. As Dr. King eloquently stated, “Darkness cannot drive out darkness, only light can do that.” Let’s stand together as a community & have that discussion so that we can shed light on the race issue in America that has been trapped in the darkness for so long.
I love you all, & there’s nothing you can do about it.
Family, I want to take a minute to discuss a trial that has gripped the nation the past year. A trial that has served to only further separate us from achieving any kind of racial harmony. As I write this I want to be clear, I am speaking to my African-American family and their response to the verdict in the Trayvon Martin (“TM”) case. Furthermore, I am not talking about the inherent facts of the case, the fact that George Zimmerman (“GZ”) racially profiled TM or any of those elements, I am speaking specifically about the verdict, what led to that result, and the bigger message we can glean from this tragedy.
The death of a young man, a kid who was by all accounts was no different from you and I, is always difficult to stomach. I want to offer my sincere condolences and prayers to TM and his family. Your son should still be with us today. Proms, graduations, and marriage, were just a few of the things TM never got to experience and never will experience because of a fateful encounter with an overzealous neighborhood watchman. I grieve your loss, along with millions of others across the nation. TM did not die in vain, it is my hope that this post will open eyes to see the larger lesson in this tragedy.
Family, inside every tragedy, every failing, every misstep is an opportunity. This is a chance not to racialize something (yes we get there were racial undertones in the trial, but at the end of the day it was bound to be because the victim was black and the perpetrator was of a different race), but to think LOGICALLY about why GZ walked. When you chalk up the resultant verdict to racism, it precludes any discussion of logic. It essentially ends the discussion before it can truly get started. The attempt here is to start the discussion.
When you invoke the race card, you’re automatically putting yourself in a victim role. Logic is removed & emotion substituted instead & no dialogue takes place. Folks we, as the Black community, have been doing this for years & it’s counterproductive. In fact it’s detrimental to the African American community. Why? Because the thing about a victim mentality is that it never requires you to take personal responsibility for your actions. Since you can always lie blame at the feet of others, you are never forced to look in the mirror & critically analyze your misdeeds. The race card has become carte blanche for black folks to forever be victims. When a verdict doesn’t go our way: racism. When we don’t get a job: racism. You black? Something bad happen to you? Clearly its racism. ENOUGH! We need to stop using this horrible crutch called the race card. It’s crippling us, It’s taking us out at the knees. The race card allows black folks to be victims & remain victims. Reducing this verdict to a racial result only furthers that victimhood mentality. We are grown, and a childish response to a grown up problem is inappropriate.
Family, this is a chance to teach our children that they don’t have chained by the shackles of victimhood. We’ve shopped on Irresponsibility Blvd, gone into a store & tried on the victimhood outfit that we’ve donned the last 300 years. No more. Enough. Being a victim is about telling someone what they can’t do; I have no intentions of telling my child what they can’t do, only what they can accomplish. I see these “black leaders” on TV who are outraged at the verdict & I shake my head. I see people post on Facebook about telling their children not to wear hoodies & I am disappointed. This is counterproductive: all you’re doing is sowing the seeds of doubt, self-hatred & inferiority in our children, & it needs to stop. Reducing this verdict to race is poisonous to our psyche, & I’m looking for the antidote. It lies in logic, communication, & thought-provoking responses to problems we face as a people. Wielding the race card in situations like this don’t achieve any of those lofty ideals. The facts of the case were unlikely to produce a guilty verdict, the burden of proof was simply too high for the prosecution & the evidence was flimsy. BUT NO IT’S A RACE THING! Uh, no. Not likely. Until we stop being so quick to use race as the root of problems, it will continue to be a problem. Do we live in a perfect society where racism doesn’t exist? Of course not. There are examples where a racial analysis would be appropriate; this is not one of them. However, if you project an image of always being a product of some racist result then it will become a self-fulfilling prophecy, and you’ll be mired in a circle of irresponsibility.
I welcome all respectful commentary. Please share your thoughts, agree, disagree, or indifferent.
I love you all, and there’s nothing you can do about it.